Words we hate

Words we hate

Postby Jim Thomsen » 9:06 pm 01/10/2008

I loathe the word "gubenatorial" and rewrite around it every time I see it.

Do you have any words like that ... like fingernails on a chalkboard for you?
Jim Thomsen
 

Postby Gerri Berendzen » 9:47 pm 01/10/2008

Utilize.
Three little letters will do.
To me it always sounds like a word pro athletes and coaches use to sound smarter. (Because I hear them use it all the time.)
Gerri Berendzen
Quincy (Ill.) Herald-Whig
Gerri Berendzen
Veteran
 
Posts: 251
Joined: 5:54 am 04/22/2006
Location: Quincy, Ill.

Postby LisaMc » 11:08 pm 01/10/2008

Spearhead (n.) -- the pointy end of a spear. Not a verb.
Lisa McLendon
ACES Vice President / Conferences
Deputy Copy Desk Chief
The Wichita Eagle
User avatar
LisaMc
Desk chief
 
Posts: 133
Joined: 7:00 pm 04/23/2006
Location: Wichita

Postby Jim Thomsen » 11:00 pm 01/14/2008

I've never cared for "brandish" ... as in "the man brandished a knife at partygoers."

Is "brandish" a conversational word in your experience? How about just "waved" or "pointed"?
Jim Thomsen
 

Alternative meaning

Postby dfisher » 11:54 am 01/15/2008

Of course, it could be fun to come up with some alternative meanings for some of these, too, as do Washington Post readers.

Brandish: (n) 1) After a few drinks, what an ad exec calls the company whose account he or she manages. 2) Something close to a brand, but not quite there yet (ex.: Google in its early years). Brandishing (v) the process of turning a company name into a verb.

8)
Fish
Doug Fisher
Univ. of SC
http://commonsensej.blogspot.com
User avatar
dfisher
Veteran
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 8:49 pm 04/21/2006
Location: Univ. of SC

Postby Deadline Dame » 10:48 pm 01/15/2008

I hate the word "fruition."
Deadline Dame
 

Postby Renee » 1:19 am 01/16/2008

"transported" = copspeak. The person was taken to the hospital.

and this is a phrase, but "fled on foot" = ran away.
User avatar
Renee
Slot
 
Posts: 60
Joined: 3:38 pm 05/10/2006
Location: Muncie, Ind.

Postby Jim Thomsen » 7:59 pm 01/16/2008

"Curb" as a verb.
Jim Thomsen
 

Postby LisaMc » 3:34 pm 01/17/2008

Gosh, the "as-a-verb" list is a biggie, and every time I think it's complete some biz reporter or quotee comes up with a new one. "Under-retailed" was the most recent (as in "The area is under-retailed, Smith said.").
Lisa McLendon
ACES Vice President / Conferences
Deputy Copy Desk Chief
The Wichita Eagle
User avatar
LisaMc
Desk chief
 
Posts: 133
Joined: 7:00 pm 04/23/2006
Location: Wichita

Postby JerseyJoe » 9:36 am 01/18/2008

In sports, the word "different" can drive me crazy at times.
If I see a sentence like: Five different players scored for the Bears in the quarter, I automatically take out the word different. It's not needed.
JerseyJoe
 

Postby Jim Thomsen » 12:03 pm 01/18/2008

As stated elsewhere, "apprehend."
Jim Thomsen
 

Postby Neil Holdway » 12:22 pm 01/18/2008

Renee took mine: "transported."
Neil Holdway
News Editor, Daily Herald (suburban Chicago)
nholdway@dailyherald.com
User avatar
Neil Holdway
Desk chief
 
Posts: 92
Joined: 2:53 pm 02/27/2006
Location: Chicago area

Postby thegel13 » 8:07 pm 01/19/2008

Gerri Berendzen wrote:Utilize.
Three little letters will do.
To me it always sounds like a word pro athletes and coaches use to sound smarter. (Because I hear them use it all the time.)


I totally agree on that one. I always change it to use.
thegel13
 

Postby JillLReed » 10:00 am 01/22/2008

I really do not like to see "shuttered" instead of "closed."
I mean, maybe the place had shutters, maybe not. How can we be sure?

I also loathe "nix" and "mull" in headlines. I know they can be useful in tight counts. But I try to avoid those.

Why? Because they really draw my ire.
JillLReed
 

Postby HCFeldman » 3:39 pm 01/25/2008

"Veritable." Not in every instance, but it seems like 85% of the time, it's just a filler word to make the writer feel more clever.
HCFeldman
 

Postby Chris Wienandt » 3:48 pm 01/25/2008

"Specifically."

As in:

Prosecutors charged Joe Blow with six counts of hooliganism.

Specifically, they allege that ...
User avatar
Chris Wienandt
Desk chief
 
Posts: 146
Joined: 6:17 pm 02/26/2006
Location: The greater metroplex regional area

Postby Jim Thomsen » 4:25 pm 01/25/2008

"Imprimatur"

It's a pretentious word that nobody uses conversationally.
Jim Thomsen
 

Postby Leslie » 4:45 pm 01/25/2008

Ditto "shuttered." It's amazing how many writers are in love with it. And "utilize."

Right beind that, "scuttled," to mean abandoned. "The plan was scuttled." Nobody that I know of uses it, or versions of it, except when quoting T.S. Eliot.

"Natch." Ick all over. Too hip by far.

As I've said somewhere else, "purchase/d" for simply "buy/bought."

One huge pet peeve is also the often unnecessarily awkward placement of the word "yesterday," especially in ledes. "President Bush yesterday said that Iraq blah blah blah."
Leslie
 

Postby thegel13 » 4:47 pm 01/25/2008

I hate when officials talk about "growing" their business.
thegel13
 

Postby Chris Wienandt » 5:53 pm 01/25/2008

Jim Thomsen wrote:"Imprimatur"

It's a pretentious word that nobody uses conversationally.

Why, just the other day, I was saying, "Perhaps I'm primatur in thinking Hillary has the nomination sewn up."

Oh, OK, maybe I didn't ...
User avatar
Chris Wienandt
Desk chief
 
Posts: 146
Joined: 6:17 pm 02/26/2006
Location: The greater metroplex regional area

Postby Jim Thomsen » 5:58 pm 01/25/2008

OK, I laughed.
Jim Thomsen
 

Postby thegel13 » 6:07 pm 01/25/2008

I just discovered today that I dislike the term "brick and mortar" to distinguish between, for example, a cyber school and the brick and mortar one.

It seems kind of cliched. Plus, what if the buildings they're talking about are made of vinyl siding or, I don't know, glass.
thegel13
 

Postby Jim Thomsen » 6:08 pm 01/25/2008

Another term that rankles along those lines is "behind bars." Most modern jails and prisons have no bars.
Jim Thomsen
 

Postby cmcshane » 9:42 pm 01/26/2008

Located is utterly useless. The store isn't located at 1452 W. Main St.; it's at 1452 W. Main St. You don't relocate; you move. You don't locate something; you find it.
cmcshane
 

Postby Jim Thomsen » 2:05 am 01/27/2008

"Currently" is almost always unnecessary.
Jim Thomsen
 

Postby Chris Wienandt » 9:06 pm 01/28/2008

Is anyone else sick and tired of "by the numbers"? Am I right in thinking it's almost always misused these days?

I may be off base here, but I think some clever cuss way back when stuck it on top of a stats box to be clever and now everyone thinks it means "these are the stats." My recollection out of the dim, dark past is that it's supposed to mean "according to the rules" or "by following the instructions" ... as in "You'd better handle this by the numbers."

Or am I crazy?

Or are these separate issues?
User avatar
Chris Wienandt
Desk chief
 
Posts: 146
Joined: 6:17 pm 02/26/2006
Location: The greater metroplex regional area

Postby Jim Thomsen » 4:43 pm 01/29/2008

You may be crazy. But that's a separate issue.
Jim Thomsen
 

Doing it by the numbers

Postby rich » 12:03 am 01/30/2008

I don't know when it originated, but if you are want to spend the time researching it, I think you will find two inch ads in dozens of World War II pulp magazines, some newspapers and even some slick magazines, that were continuously reprinted for several years. These ads offered budding artists the opportunity to paint great works of art by using a kit that correlated colors with numbered spaces on a canvas, paper, art board or other surface to which paint could be applied. The ads said that purchasers would be sent an artist's kit containing (oil or water) colors and several such surfaces upon which line-drawing outlines were divided and subdivided into numbered segments. If the artist applied the color that corresponded with its number in every appropriate place, a marvelous work of art was supposed to result.

Some people who painted by the numbers allegedly displayed their work with great pride. Perhaps that is what provoked a standard form of denigration in art classes: “That person paints by the numbers.”

But, I think the number-identification system was used, also in those days, by makers of the kits builders of model airplanes and the like used, too. I don’t know.

I do know that the expression has been around for at least that long.

Richard
rich
 

BTN

Postby dfisher » 7:43 am 01/30/2008

By the numbers is long-established idiom for doing something mechanically, step-by-step. I recall dimly reading that the origin was the military or military-related, but I can't find the cite.
Doug
Doug Fisher
Univ. of SC
http://commonsensej.blogspot.com
User avatar
dfisher
Veteran
 
Posts: 225
Joined: 8:49 pm 04/21/2006
Location: Univ. of SC

Postby Chris Wienandt » 10:08 am 01/30/2008

I had a couple of those paint-by-numbers kits myself when I was maybe 7 or 8 (the results were awful), and I built model cars and airplanes, too. Those were definitely by-the-numbers activities, but I have a feeling the expression predates them. Of course, it's only a feeling, and we know how reliable those are.

I'll look into the OED this afternoon when I get to work and see if there's anything in there about this.

In any case, I still hate "by the numbers" as a one-size-fits-lots graphics headline, and I change it whenever I see it.
User avatar
Chris Wienandt
Desk chief
 
Posts: 146
Joined: 6:17 pm 02/26/2006
Location: The greater metroplex regional area

Next

Return to Grammar, style and usage



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

User Control Panel

Login

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 61 on 6:18 pm 04/24/2012

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest