ONLINE-EDITING TRACK

Wild Wild Web

In cyberspace, the news cycle never ceases and the rules are evolving.
Yet online journalism is still journalism, and opportunities abound
for those with solid editing skills.

Leading the discussion of "Editing in a Multimedia World" are, from left, Suzanne Levinson (miamiherald.com), John Russial (University of Oregon) and Eric Ulken (latimes.com).

By Kate Karp

With nearly every paper in the country supporting an adjunct Web site, copy desks are jumping into fast cars and driving the Information Superhighway, leaving print-only in the dust.

At this year’s ACES conference in Miami, an online journalism track was introduced to address questions and topics that plague or intrigue copy editors: necessary skills to facilitate a culture change, job cuts and opportunities, the importance of a print medium in a cyber world and what sort of animal exists as a Web page.

“What rules do we follow?” asked Robert Griffin, assistant news editor at The Oklahoman.

According to John Russial of University of Oregon and co-presenter of “Editing in a Multimedia World,” all bets are off, for now. The rules are still being written, whether by individual editorial staff, reporters, online producers, print editors or a combination of any and all. Online journalism is still in a fledgling state, but has a wingspan that seems to be extending indefinitely.

One of the first eggs was hatched in 1993, Russial said, when the San Jose Mercury put up a Web site. As browsers and technology improved, the number of papers with sites increased. Now, nearly 100 percent of print media have adjunct sites, and the order of the day is sorting out what to put on them, and how the material differs for BlackBerrys, iPods, cell phones and those increasingly ubiquitous blogs. The mind Googles.


Leslie-Jean Thornton (Arizona State University) gave a primer on the basics of news Web sites.
And it all has to be edited. Russial and the other presenters, Suzanne Levinson of miamiherald.com and Eric Ulken from latimes.com, described the current form of online editing as ranging from utilizing a special online division to make sure the text is in proper form to dumping it all in without touching it.

However, Levinson said, “online editions are not appendages or afterthoughts; they are the first edition. The word is still king.”

Online writing, as with print, still has to serve the story, be correct and engage the mind, but with the immediacy that the Internet provides, it’s necessary to catch the eye first. The most well-designed page with plenty of links and a couple of user blogs still has to have bait to hook readers. This is where one of the many online initialisms, SEO (Search Engine Optimization), comes in. Headlines are still key, but don’t have the same function as a zippy hed does. Instead, they are straightforward, with key story vocabulary that will quickly lead readers to the site. For example, “Trump Bristles at O’Donnell’s Hairstyle Brush-Off” may be wordy, but will bring more hits to a Web site than “Host Wigs Out.”

The presenters also stressed the importance of attending to “traffic time,” which are the hours when the most people are making hits; specificity of content (as with Gertrude Stein and Oakland, there is no “there” there on the Internet, and a local story still must have the exact date and location of the event covered); and design, which also includes ad placement. An ad may be put on the home page or in a pop-up. As in most media, ads drive the viability of an online paper, and a home page is not considered the front page.

In “Intro to Online Editing,” Leslie-Jean Thornton of Arizona State University spoke of the danger of putting material up quickly to be first with a story, instead of spending time to make it correct. A piece of erroneous information that is up for a number of seconds and then quickly taken down for correction will have already been seen by thousands of people, and most Web sites don’t print retractions. Photographs, too, need to be checked to see that they haven’t been fed into a previously used caption. Russial showed a number of amusing and embarrassing examples of this.

Blogs are useful for gauging reader response and getting an idea of who the readers are, but also create a question of interactivity and credibility that, according to Thornton, is “another weekend of sessions altogether.” There was also strong warning against editing any of the postings. Any editorial changes could subject the newspaper to liability that might result from an offending posting. It was advised to either dump questionable postings or leave them in their original form.


Chris Wienandt (Dallas Morning News) leads a discussion on "Reorganizing the Newsroom for Online," part of the online track at the Miami conference.
To address the question of skills necessary to make the cyberjump, Thornton discussed several adjunct skills necessary to make the transition, such as copy/paste, correcting material in code and audio/visual editing. Editing can take the form of chunking instead of attention to story flow, and the first paragraph of a story is always a teaser to draw in the reader to the rest of it. Thornton also extensively defined SEO and other initialisms related to online text, and showed a short Web video, Web 2.0…The Machine is Us/ing Us.

CNN.com’s Jim Kavanagh, who presented in “Leaving Print for Online,” stressed that any competent copy editor already has the necessary basic skills and needs only to learn the new culture. Online journalism is still journalism. Although print media has seen a decline in job positions, Kavanagh sees the lost jobs following the ad money that is increasingly going online.

To the notion that print media will soon go the way of the drive-in movie and that readers will have to wrestle with the logistics of a laptop in the bathroom or the expense of lining the hamster cage with them, there was considerable naysaying. ESPN’s Jay Wang, copresenter of “Leaving Print for Online,” said that paper ranks higher in keepsake value and portability. Russial was even more optimistic.

“They thought that radio would kill newspaper, TV would kill radio and everything would kill books,” he said. “None of that has happened. Paper will probably never disappear -- or at least, not soon.”

To view Web 2.0…The Machine is Us/ing Us, visit
www.youtube.com/watch?V=6gmP4nK0EOE. What the heck, use your SEO and Google the key words.


Kate Karp is a freelance copy editor and proofreader from Long Beach, Calif.

RETURN TO WWW.COPYDESK.ORG